------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-10
23:31 -------
--I also see that in a lot of places you have converted nsString& parameters
to
--nsAString& parameters. While this is laudable, is it what we really want?
In
--some cases we might want nsAFlatString& for performance reasons (where we
know
--the string will be flat, i.e. single fragment, zero-terminated, and most
or all
--usage of that code will be from flat strings, and we can hand flatten the
few
--non flat strings).
Should the XPIDL AString be AFlatString instead? Are there really cases in
the Mozilla code where you want to send AString's across an XPCOM interface?
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
