Mike Shaver wrote: > Christof Meerwald wrote: > >> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:15:14 -0700, Alec Flett wrote: >> >>> Christof Meerwald wrote: >>> >>>> It seems that "netwerk/base/public/Makefile" is missing from >>>> MAKEFILES_xpcom >>>> in allmakefiles.sh. >>>> >>> The build seems to be building for most people, as tinderbox is >>> staying green (aka "building cleanly") for unix: >>> >> >> And how many are building *standalone* XPCOM/XPConnect?
None of them. > Adding the Makefile isn't the right thing here, IMHO. We shouldn't have > dependencies on netwerk from XPCOM, but I understand that we're going to > make STANDALONE the only mode of building for XPCOM, so it's a temporary > setback. However, until the dependencies are properly removed, we still need to have these standalone builds work. The xpcom standalone build pulls in the extra directories to satisfy the dependencies rather than using the XPCOM_STANDALONE define to chop off functionality. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24515 & http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57282 . - cls
