Mike Shaver wrote: > > So why are we providing (and freezing, and therefore promising to > support) NS_GetServiceManager?
This API is for ease of use as well as for use in the glue library. > Who needs the service manager but doesn't get it through their nsIModule thing? It will be a requirement of the 'glue' helper library that we are creating. A similar API will be NS_GetComponentManager(). >Do we really want to add to the already-large set of entry points we have to >document and support? I don't think that we have a choice. We need public methods to get to the service manager and component manager. doug turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
