Jon Smirl wrote: > It's not just arbitrary implementations, because of the inlining if netlib > wants to issue a minor binary patch that disturbs its memory layout, then > every component that calls it has to be patched too. This could cause a > minor security patch to force a re-download of the entire Mozilla install.
I don't really understand what you're saying, or why the inlining makes a difference, but that's OK. Take it to .netlib. Mike
