I've noticed Rick Parrish talking about well formed ContractIDs on .. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/co-xpcom2.html
According to this, "The recommended format of a contract ID is a one-line string as follows:" @<internetdomain>/module[/submodule[...]];<version>[?<name>=<value>[&<name>= <value>[...]]] Is this part of the XPCOM mantra, formally agreed? At least from a pure syntactical viewpoint, leaving semantics aside? Just best practice? Toby.
