Chris Hoess wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jerry Tan wrote: > >>why mozilla chose to create their own component model xpcom, >> >>just for portable? >> >>Why not chose corba ? >> > > > My (very tenative) understanding of XPCOM is that it offers more > flexibility in dropping components in and out as well as being > cross-platform. I've crossposted to n.p.m.xpcom where people who know > what they're talking about will probably be able to give you a better > answer. > > F'ups to n.p.m.xpcom. >
Axel posted one reason on .performance.
