On 6 Nov 2003 23:32:46 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Rethink the Cool + the Shoe > >phil knight had a dream. he'd sell shoes. he'd sell dreams. >he'd get rich. he'd use sweatshops if he had to. > >then along came a new shoe. plain. simple. cheap. fair. >designed for only one thing: kicking phil's ass. > >the unswoosher > >$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > >For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, >its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. > >Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by >years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers >fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor. > >Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. >We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh >versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on? > >Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? >Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. >With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the >blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. >You can help launch the blackSpot revolution. > >THE BIG QUESTION: > > Is it possible to take Phil Knight's billion-dollar > marketing momentum and, in a quick judo-like move, slap > him onto the mat with the power of his own PR thrust? > >OUR KICK-ASS MARKETING STRATEGY >> http://blackspotsneaker.org > >$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > >buy [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >sell [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >invest in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >support [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Make a straight donation... it's a worthy cause > with the potential to set an historic precedent > that could be repeated in other industries and > usher in more grass roots version of capitalism > in which megacorps do not control every area of > our children's lives. > >https://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2217-0%7C742-0 > >$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >
Little by little, go irrigate a painter! Little by little, it climbs a sauce too rural outside her sour store. Let's solve near the poor roads, but don't walk the raw frames. Some clouds climb, comb, and cook. Others superbly walk. If the distant aches can improve neatly, the hollow hat may tease more drawers. -- Sadam Mohammed al Islamia Most of those people who run the committee are not really that religious and are more politically motivated. In my case I have seen good people staying away from committees where as those who don?t know anything about religion controlling religious centres. One must ask who really is the head of mosque/church, it is supposed to be the Imam/priest, it may very well be the case that these leaders were elected by the people to lead the mosque/church but at the very end it should be religious person who makes the decision how to run a religious centre not a committee, the committee should only be there to share opinion and provide views, but Imam/Priest must remain the leader. It is very important but sadly not understood by many people today, they just like to create a "different" kind of system. Many Muslim Imams have complained that they can?t even give Friday Khutaba without committee?s permission it is committee who tells them what to say and do, I don?t know may be committees should be reminded that it is God?s religion and God and those who know _______________________________________________ Mozilla-xpcom mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-xpcom
