Hello,
first some data: (-V1 -mj -h -b128 -q1)
3.86 (nommx)
> Encoding c.wav to c-386-nommx.mp3
> Encoding as 44.1 kHz VBR(q=1) j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII ( 6.0x estimated) qval=1
> Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated | play/CPU | ETA
> 12498/ 12498(100%)| 0:04:07/ 0:04:07| 0:04:07/ 0:04:07| 1.3215| 0:00:00
> ----- bitrate statistics -----
> [kbps] frames
> 32 9 (0.1%)
> 128 109 (0.9%)
> 160 1270 (10.2%)
> 192 4365 (34.9%)
> 224 2074 (16.6%)
> 256 1305 (10.4%)
> 320 3367 (26.9%)
>
> average: 235 kbs
3.87 nommx:
> LAME version 3.87 (beta 1, Sep 26 2000) (http://www.mp3dev.org)
> Win32 binaries from www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/
> polyphase lowpass filter disabled
> Encoding c.wav to c-ic-nommx.mp3
> Encoding as 44.1 kHz VBR(q=1) j-stereo MPEG-1 LayerIII ( 6.0x estimated) qval=1
> Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA
> 12498/12498 (100%)| 3:25/ 3:25| 3:26/ 3:26| 1.5855x| 0:00
> 32 [%.1]*
> 128 [ 2%]***
> 160 [19%]*****************************
> 192 [33%]**************************************************
> 224 [13%]********************
> 256 [10%]***************
> 320 [24%]*************************************
> average: 225.8 kbps
3.87 MMX
> LAME version 3.87 (beta 1, Sep 27 2000) (http://www.mp3dev.org)
> Win32 binaries from www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/
> polyphase lowpass filter disabled
> Encoding c.wav to c-ic.mp3
> Encoding as 44.1 kHz VBR(q=1) j-stereo MPEG-1 LayerIII ( 6.0x estimated) qval=1
> Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA
> 12498/12498 (100%)| 3:03/ 3:03| 3:03/ 3:03| 1.7822x| 0:00
> 32 [%.1]*
> 128 [ 2%]***
> 160 [18%]****************************
> 192 [33%]**************************************************
> 224 [13%]********************
> 256 [11%]*****************
> 320 [22%]**********************************
> average: 224.6 kbps
remarks:
1) 3.87 MMX is smaller, yet it sounds better (???) (velvet JS noise)
1b)3.87 -V1 is 20% faster than 3.86 (thanks Robert!)
1c)3.87 -V1 MMX is 35% faster than 3.86 (thanks Takehiro!)
2) I miss the # of frames in each bitrate mode. The new real-time %
data looks really neat, but please re-instate the # frames.
3) Would be really something if it would also say [total# frames/total
# of S frames/ total # of M/S frames]. Room enough on the lines :)
4) Why does the MMX mode and non-MMX mode give different output on my
Cel450/Win95OSR2? Isn't MMX supposed to give same results?
thanks and
Best regards,
Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
