Mark Powell schrieb am Don, 28 Sep 2000: > He also thinks -q1 could be unsafe. Is that unsafe just in v3.87 or has it > always been so, Robert? Well, if we considered it always safe, we had made it default. Combined with some -V0 or -V1 it seems to be OK. If you compare "-V2 -q1 -d -mj -k vbrtest.wav" with "-V3 -q2 -d -mj -k vbrtest.wav" which result in a similar size, I prefer the latter. I think that the larger scalefactor range due to -q1 could help CBR encoding more than VBR. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no M... Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and... Yog Sothoth
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] --nspsytu... Robert Hegemann
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX gi... Dmitry
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and n... Robert Hegemann
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX a... Alexander Leidinger
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] RH_AMP... Robert Hegemann
- Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MM... Roel VdB
- Re: Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX a... Mark Powell
- Re: Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b ... Robert Hegemann
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX ... Robert Hegemann
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and n... Dmitry
- Re: Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b ... Robert Hegemann
- Re[6]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b ... Roel VdB
- Re: Re[6]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.... Joshua Bahnsen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different... Mark Powell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different... Adam Ottley
- [MP3 ENCODER] Second question: Compatiblity Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different... Youri Pepplinkhuizen