Did you contact the manufacturer of the DVD player ?
Are the any firmware updates available ?

Fix the bugs , not the symptoms !

Regards,
david

Randolph Way wrote:
> 
> Thanks to all who replied! Mark, I've tried the switches you suggested, no
> joy. I also tried -p, -d, -k, -h, even tried changing the output sampling
> frequency to 48kHz with no luck. I also have discovered that this DVD player
> can play back Fraunhofer encoded VBR files as well as CBR with no problems!
> Anyway, if you're willing to send me the modified version of LAME for
> testing, I'm game. I'd really like to be able to help and use LAME instead
> if I can.
> Thanks again.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME Incompatability Problem
> 
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Randolph Way
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:30 PM
> > > Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME Incompatability Problem
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all, I'm hoping someone can help with this. I recently purchased a
> new
> > > DVD player, that can also play mp3's burned onto CD (a Panasonic
> DVD-RV31).
> > > It will play back mp3's encoded with Radium's Fraunhofer Pro. perfectly,
> but
> > > suffers frequent pauses when playing back files encoded with LAME's 3.89
> > > beta. I'm making these files on Win98SE, using WinDAC32, and the LAME
> files
> > > play back perfectly (and sound better IMHO than the Fraunhofer's) on my
> > > 'puter. I'm encoding them at 320kps CBR, in high quality and stereo,
> which
> > > are the only settings I've changed from the defaults. Does anyone know
> of
> > > any settings I can enable/disable in the LAME codec that will allow my
> > > player to decode them properly?
> > > TIA for any ideas/assistance.
> > >
> >
> > There have been several reports of hardware players having trouble
> > with high bitrate LAME encoded mp3s, but no one with one of these
> > players has been willing to spend some time with LAME to track down
> > exactly what is causing the problem.  It is most likely related to a
> > poorly worded part of the standard which seems to require high bitrate
> > encodings to waste a significant percentage of the bits available.
> > The difference comes down to a trivial amount of memory - 960 bytes or
> > 1440 byte buffer.
> >
> > Could you try the following:
> >
> > 1. disable bit reservoir:
> > lame --nores -b 320
> >
> > 2. restrict maximum required buffer size:
> > lame --strictly-enforce-ISO -b 320
> >
> > 3. both 1 and 2:
> > lame --nores --strictly-enforce-ISO -b 320
> >
> > And there is one other experiment we would like to try on one of these
> > players, but it involves a modified version of LAME.
> >
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/
> >
> 
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/


-- 
David Balazic
--------------
"Be excellent to each other." - Bill S. Preston, Esq., & "Ted" Theodore Logan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/

Reply via email to