> Now we are too lazy too > decide if it should be fixed or removed :-)
Sounds like many others have decided for you that it should be removed ::-). > The only real documentation would be the ISO docs themselves. The two > psy-models in lame, gspycho and --nspsytune are both modeled after the ISO > psy-model (using ideas from both MP3 and AAC). They differ in things like > how tonality is estimated, how pre-echo is detected, but the basic > principles are the same. I personally believe that the noise > shapping (how you distribute the bits among the coefficients, > given a set of masking data) is the dominant determination > of quality. I dont know if noise shapping algorithms are > considered part of the psycho acoustic model? Though I'm not real up on these technical terms for the algorithms, it certainly sounds like these things would be called part of the psyco acoustic model. Hmmm, I'm not familiar with this --nspsytune switch to lame. Trying it doubles my encoding time and seems to introduce more noise (though I just spent a bunch of hours seeing They Might Be Giants... so ears prolly aren't in such great shape ::-). I suspect this too is legacy? Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
