maybe the --mp3input option is of interest for you, but i do not know if lame
does something else than just decoding and re-encoding. at least it should
save the disk space of the .wav file...
regards
wernfried haas
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:21:52PM +0000, Yosi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a certain mp3 file that I would like to re-encode with Lame. By
> "re-encode" I mean, to let lame encode the mp3 file again (and yes, I know
> that it is lossy). The obvious thing will be to let lame decode the mp3 into
> wave, and then run lame again and encode the produced wave file. Is there a
> better way to do it, in terms of preserving as much quality as possible?
>
> Thanks,
> Yosi
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> mp3encoder mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
--
-> Wernfried Haas - [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Homepage: http://xover.mud.at/~amnenion
-> Beutelland: http://bl.mud.at
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
