Hello Raider, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 7:57:39 AM, you wrote:
R> That particular tool is your ear. Some have a better hearing than you, R> some have a more poor hearing than you. It's all up to your ears. And R> as the medical science says - our ears aren't getting any better with R> time. They are getting worse actually. So, make some tests, check R> what's good for you and use that particular combination. Anything R> beyond that is just a waste of bits. I understand that my ear is "tool", but if it comes to so little differences ear can't detect (my ear) and file size is important, I really need some kind of automatic tool for detecting quality level, also time for computer to banalize the song is much smaller than real time of song. For instance I need to pack 10 cd's, and try several encoding settings that is for instance around 300 mp3 files . I don't have time to listen all of them ! ! ! I think you can see my point now. It is not stupid, it is practical! -- Best regards, Vladimir mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
