hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:24:22PM +0200, Vladimir Mincev wrote:
> R> You should read more careful the included documentation. -vbr or
> R> --vbr-old is the "old" way of doing Variable Bitrate Encoding. Slower,
> R> much tested. As of 2.91 if I recall well the --vbr-new is as good as
> R> --vbr-old when it comes to quality. But keep in mind that is a
> R> DIFFERENT METHOD. It is a lot faster also. That's about it.
yeah, that's in the manual.
>
> R> As the other list memebers have told you - RTFM.
rtfm helps for many problems, but there's not much more in either manpage
nor in the docs directory, so i think rtfm is a bit of a short answer.
or did i miss something in the docs?
> I have read the manual, but there is no tech info about differences
> between those two VBR settings. Both work fine when decoded so
> question was, should I stick to old (slower an well tested) or go to
> new (faster) metod!? Have somebody had a problems using new VBR?
would be interesting for me, too. especially which of them will be used
in upcoming versions. both? will vbr-new replace vbr-old? will vbr-new
become standard for vbr-encoding? will mulder and scully finally kiss?
regards,
wernfried
--
-> Wernfried Haas - [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Homepage: http://xover.mud.at/~amnenion
-> Beutelland: http://bl.mud.at
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
