Howdy sandeep, > I am trying to play with psychoacoustics.I am messed with the delay > concept
I don't understand you, but I think I know what you mean... I tried for a long time to understand the derivation of the delay constant in the MPEG committee code (ATT model) and it 'messed' me too. > Can anyone tell me how to give the delay for psychoacoustic model ? > Should it be given for every 576 samples or every 1152 samples or a > one > time delay of 768 samples is sufficient for whole process? Well, I no longer really have access to my code, so I can't remember the exact details, but as I recall, the 768 was completely wrong, and I don't think I ever came up with either any documentation of why that number was chosen, or a good reverse engineering of how it was arrived at. If you grep around in the archive, you may be able to find Mark and/or myself discussing the numbers we ended up using. If that fails, email me, and I'll take a look around to see if I can find any of my documentation, but since ClearBand went out of business six months ago, I may not be able to turn anything up. Or maybe Mark will help you out? > I looked for some material in net and landed with Ramapriya Rangachars > material.I didn't the way samples should be systematically delayed . > Can anyone help me in this regard?? I can't parse your English, and have never heard of Rangachars, so I'm afraid I can't help here. Hope that helps, Alex _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
