0> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 0> Alexander Leidinger <URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ("AL") wrote:
AL> On 03 Sep 2002 14:14:34 +0100 Toby Speight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AL> wrote: >> Would a union achieve the same thing more portably? AL> It would achieve the same thing, but if it is more portable or AL> not... I thought about using an union too, but as you see my coin AL> decided to not use it. Looks like we think along the same lines - I was in two minds whether to even mention the union possibility. I honestly don't know which way is better; I'm hoping to hear arguments for or against each approach (in a selfish attempt to improve my C knowledge). >> I suppose, given that this is an autoconf test, the Right Thing is >> to do the same as the actual code we're compiling. I couldn't find >> where the above test's results get used, but it seems that the >> int/float case uses unions in quantize_pvt.c and vbrquantize.c. AL> Where do you think the above test fails? I don't think the test *fails* as such - I was asking out of interest as much as anything. Sorry if it sounded like I was insulting your code. :-( I'll return to lurking now. :-) _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
