Hi i have a simple question. During the ripping of mp3 from audio CDs, is the quality of the mp3 affected by the quality of ur sound card? Or it only has to do with the codec? Will the quality of the mp3 improves if I my sound card is audigy2 instead of Sb Live 5.1?Thank u very much!
regards
Ed.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: mp3encoder digest, Vol 1 #329 - 2 msgs
>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:05:23 +1000 (EST)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc3-f37.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.236.172]) by mc3-s8.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:06:42 -0800
>Received: from minnie.tuhs.org ([131.245.7.145]) by mc3-f37.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:06:07 -0800
>Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by minnie.tuhs.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gAC25Nn08321;Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:05:23 +1000 (EST)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mailer: Mailman v2.0.8
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
>Precedence: bulk
>X-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>List-Help:
>List-Post:
>List-Subscribe: ,
>List-Id: MP3 encoders development list
>List-Unsubscribe: ,
>List-Archive:
>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2002 02:06:08.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[1065AB50:01C289F0]
>
>Send mp3encoder mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of mp3encoder digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Obtaining a raw MP3 audio data in bits (Eric Dantan Rzewnicki)
> 2. Re: Lame truncates long files... (Haas Wernfried)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:35:47 -0500
>From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Obtaining a raw MP3 audio data in bits
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do....
>
>But, this site gives the bitwise layout of mp3 headers:
>
>http://www.dv.co.yu/mpgscript/mpeghdr.htm
>
>hope that helps.
>
>-Eric Rz.
>
>On Sat 09/11/2002 02:03:27, himachandra chebrolu wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> > My aim is to decode raw MP3 data in bit format into a
> > sound file.I've my huffman decoder and everything
> > else,but I need to understand how data is packed.
> > i.e.issues like where the header is,how many bits are
> > allocated to main data etc.
> > As a first step I want to collect the raw bit data.
> > I tried opening a MP3 file using notepad and it
> > resulted in different symbols but not zeros and ones.
> > So can anyone suggest me a method to obtain the raw
> > data in the form of 0's and 1's.
> > Thanks,
> > Himachandra.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> > http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > mp3encoder mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:12:16 +0100
>From: Haas Wernfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame truncates long files...
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>hello,
>On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:13:07PM -0800, Richard Brockie wrote:
> > I am using Lame (--r3mix) to mp3 encode large (~2hr) wav files. I edit
> > the intro and outro of the wav files to something pleasing, but find
> > that the mp3 file is truncated by an amount which seems to be
> > proportional to the length of the file. Is this known behaviour and is
> > there something which can be done to get round this?
>hmm, i don't exactly understand what you mean by "truncated by an amount
>which seems to be proportional to the length of the file".
>i just checked my two longest mp3s (approx 2.0 and 2.5 hours long), both
>of them encoded with lame 3.92 --alt-preset standard. they play fine,
>the only thing i could see was, that when i went to the end of the
>files in xmms they still played for about 10-20 seconds though the
>time-counter was at end of file. maybe this is the same thing you are
>experiencing?
>
>i also remember that i once encoded something quite long with an older
>version of lame, i had trouble seeking in that file after about 1.5 hours
>with xmms, but as i had already switched to lame 3.92 at that time and
>the problem already had disappeared in 3.92, i did not really care
>about seeking a bug in an old version ;)
>
>which version of lame are you using and with which software are you
>decoding your mp3s?
>
>regards,
> wernfried
>
>--
>-> Fppmpppffpppmpfpffmffmppmpm Mfpmmmmmmfmm
>-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-> mfpfmpfmppfm://fpfppffpmmpppff.ppmfmfmpm.mmmfmp/~mmmppmpppmpppppmffppfppp
>-> http://www.namesuppressed.com/kenny/
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>mp3encoder mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
>
>End of mp3encoder Digest
�������
MSN Explorer
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
