At 10:36 2003-01-23 -0600, Todd Delaune wrote:

> I actually considered that as an option, but my true goal is to have
> one program that can handle the conversion in one step.

May I ask why?

(Whether you have one or two programs, the number of steps to be performed
behind the scenes is remains the same: the .vox data has to be decoded into
raw data, and the raw data has to be encoded into .mp3 data.  Whether
sox.exe and LAME.exe or sox_and_LAME.exe do this is just a cosmetic
difference, isn't it?)
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to