> Jon Skeet wrote: > > Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all? I was > > wondering whether it might not be an interesting project, > >partly for performance comparison purposes
> I'm sorry but you will not gain any performance enhancements by > converting Lame to CLR byte code. No, I wasn't expecting to. However, I wouldn't expect to *lose* very much either, contrary (I suspect) to the expectations of a lot of people. So long as the .NET version was within 10% of native performance, I think I'd deem that reasonably acceptable. Jon _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
