On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:35:37 +0000 "Fred Nevez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi > i would like to know if there is any chance to have an AMD64 compiled > version of Lame codec from you ? > Thanks A LOT (please reply me yes or no it will avoid me to wait :)) The LAME project doesn't distribute binary version of LAME, so there's _no_ chance the get LAME for Win64 from _us_. Side note: I don't _expect_ a performance gain in using a AMD64 compiled version. Switching from 32bit to 64bit results in a larger executable (as pointers grow from 32 to 64 bits). This may result in a _slower_ executable, as the resulting code may not fit into the CPU cache anymore. The cache would play ping-pong in this case (switching between parts of the code). I've read about a performance loss of 20-30% for some specific applications (but with sparc64, not amd64). If someone compares the performance between an ia32 and amd64 compiled version of LAME, I would be interested to know the actual numbers. Win64 should be able to run Win32 programs, so I suggest to use the Win32 version of LAME. > PS : Perhaps this can help you for compilation : > http://www.collosumus.net/amd64/pgm/cl_1.html I've CCed the lame development list and the general MP3 encoder list. Perhaps someone is interested in helping you. Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
