Hi:

I only just noticed that Lame 3.96 was out.  Guess I thought something
would have been posted here, or is this the wrong place for that sort of
thing?

Anyway, I noticed that at quality levels higher (higher quality that is)
than -q 2, there seems to be a performance hit with 3.96 over 3.95.1.  Is
this because 3.96 is actually working harder or have some optimisations
been disabled?  I compiled with --enable-nasm.

These were observed encoding at 44.1 khz 128kbps stereo CBR.  At -q 0 the
increase in estimated time is about 30-40%.

Geoff.

_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to