Hi: I only just noticed that Lame 3.96 was out. Guess I thought something would have been posted here, or is this the wrong place for that sort of thing?
Anyway, I noticed that at quality levels higher (higher quality that is) than -q 2, there seems to be a performance hit with 3.96 over 3.95.1. Is this because 3.96 is actually working harder or have some optimisations been disabled? I compiled with --enable-nasm. These were observed encoding at 44.1 khz 128kbps stereo CBR. At -q 0 the increase in estimated time is about 30-40%. Geoff. _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
