OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some other posibility I'll be waiting.
Thank you very much. Joaquín 2009/8/3 Hans Meine <hans_me...@gmx.net> > Hi again! > > On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote: > > Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes > > aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small > wav > > files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in > > just one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I > > have. I think that some method should exist to avoid this. > > Indeed with MP3s this is not so easy. It is probably simply impossible to > do > so after encoding, even when re-packing the MP3 files (i.e. not using file > concatenation, but copying data selectively, using the bit reservoir and > what > else there is), due to the fundamental nature of the encoding (being > frequency- and not time sampling-based). > > So in your case I would agree with Aleksandar, that .wav concatenation is > the > way to go. > > Best, > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > mp3encoder mailing list > mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder > _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
