On 2014/10/06 15:20, Ben Boeckel <[email protected]> wrote: > Bleh. Only Debian really does this though, right? I think Red Hat and > Fedora both say that OpenSSL is part of the system and that's that > (similar to how the Microsoft C Runtime is "compatible"). Not sure what > other "major" binary distros say.
That is a strawman argument. That way, you can declare all libraries "system libraries", and suddenly you can link GPL binaries with any amount of non-free code. Why would a pure userspace library that is not even part of any language standard be a "system library"? It's just some user-space utility library, like any other. GnuTLS is not "system" either, nor is NSS. None of these provide access to the operating system. > SSH + socat I guess ;) . Less "modern" I suppose, but probably more > secure than trusting arbitrary CA entities (with DNSSEC and SSHFP > entries in DNS at least). SSH port forwarding is being used by many people already to access MPD securely. Max _______________________________________________ mpd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel
