>> If you don’t say C++, there’s no reason OMPI and MPICH can’t do the obvious, 
>> trivial and intelligent thing.
> I guess I disagree with all three of those hyperbolic assertions.  :-)
> You're ignoring the long tail of consequences here -- what about PMPI/tools?  
> What about other C++ features that we should be using, too?  ...?

No scope creep. No slippery slope. Do the one thing we need to go and stop. 
Leave the rest for MPI-5. 

mpi-forum mailing list

Reply via email to