> 
>> If you don’t say C++, there’s no reason OMPI and MPICH can’t do the obvious, 
>> trivial and intelligent thing.
> 
> I guess I disagree with all three of those hyperbolic assertions.  :-)
> 
> You're ignoring the long tail of consequences here -- what about PMPI/tools?  
> What about other C++ features that we should be using, too?  ...?

No scope creep. No slippery slope. Do the one thing we need to go and stop. 
Leave the rest for MPI-5. 

Jeff
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum

Reply via email to