> >> If you don’t say C++, there’s no reason OMPI and MPICH can’t do the obvious, >> trivial and intelligent thing. > > I guess I disagree with all three of those hyperbolic assertions. :-) > > You're ignoring the long tail of consequences here -- what about PMPI/tools? > What about other C++ features that we should be using, too? ...?
No scope creep. No slippery slope. Do the one thing we need to go and stop. Leave the rest for MPI-5. Jeff _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
