The Pythonization group has Pythonized the bindings in the entire document. We've completed a first correctness pass over the work, but we need more eyes to compare the end result of our work to the (non-Pythonized) head of the mpi-4.x branch.
Some of you have already done your review. Thank you!! To be clear: this review does not include Embiggening. It is more-or-less the "MPI-3.1" style of function bindings. See this wiki page for instructions<https://github.com/mpiwg-large-count/large-count-issues/wiki/pythonizing-initial-review>. For additional information, also see the Pythonization slides presented at the Forum in December<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1QZyh6TbjDMu7mEcNqBFfe9fFOltaCtxgZ2ZODzdtDpI/edit#slide=id.g5d01a902fe_0_69>. If you have any questions or problems, let us know in the Embiggening WG. If you just want to compare the rendered PDF: * Here's a PDF from the head of the mpi-4.x branch<https://aws.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/forum-unofficial/mpi-report-mpi4xhead-d8ad059.pdf> (i.e., old/original LaTeX) * Here's a PDF from the head of the Pythonization branch<https://aws.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/forum-unofficial/mpi-report-15b96e7-pythonized-NOT-emibggened.pdf> with no Embiggening (i.e,. new/Python-rendered LaTeX) -- updated 14 Jan 2020 Deadline: 21 Jan, 2020 This gives us time to finalize everything before the T-2 week deadline for the Portland Forum meeting. NOTE: At the ABQ Forum meeting, I asked you to commit/PR your approvals.json file that resulted from running the tool. This is no longer necessary -- please just mark the google spreadsheet as described in the wiki. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com<mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com>
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
