Hi all,

I made some suggestions in the PR source codes. In the added text for the info 
key argument, there are references to MPI_RECV_INIT and MPI_SEND_INIT, where it 
should be MPI_PRECV_INIT and MPI_PSEND_INIT.


example:

" Also  unlike  MPI_RECV_INIT,  MPI_RECV_INIT  takes  an  info argument. " 
should be "Also  unlike  MPI_RECV_INIT,  MPI_PRECV_INIT  takes  an  info 
argument."



Also, I just spotted a minor typo: p90 l.9 in the send pdf: " for partitioned 
communication: They provide MPI_PSEND_INIT and MPI_PRECV_INIT". The "T" of 
"They" shouldn't be a capital letter.


Cheers,

Julien J.


________________________________
De : mpi-forum <mpi-forum-boun...@lists.mpi-forum.org> de la part de Skjellum, 
Anthony via mpi-forum <mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Envoyé : samedi 12 septembre 2020 21:11
À : Main MPI Forum mailing list
Cc : Skjellum, Anthony
Objet : [Mpi-forum] Announcing Erratum (Ticket #308) for Reading for September 
meeting -- Add MPI_INFO argument to MPI_PSEND_INIT and MPI_PRECV_INIT

Dear colleagues:

Please see:

Issue:  https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/308
PR:  https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/275
[When the Partitioned chapter is merged into the mpi-4 branch, this will be 
clean; till then, Dan made a PR local
to our WG, as follows: https://github.com/mpiwg-persistence/mpi-standard/pull/3 
(WG access required)]

Latest PDF:  
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/files/5213130/mpi40-report-ticket308-12sep20.pdf

Thank you,
Tony Skjellum, Ryan Grant, Puri Bangalore




Anthony Skjellum, PhD

Professor of Computer Science and Chair of Excellence

Director, SimCenter

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC)

tony-skjel...@utc.edu  [or skjel...@gmail.com]

cell: 205-807-4968

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum

Reply via email to