I'd like a way to tell users programmatically about features ROMIO supports.
One way I imagined doing so was through the info object, though we're having
some internal discussion about how kosher that is. Any thoughts from the
broader MPI community about an approach like this:
```
MPI_Info_create(&info);
MPI_Info_set(info, "romio_feature_xyz", "requested");
MPI_File_open(...)
MPI_File_get_info(fh, &info_used)
MPI_File_get_info(info_used, "romio_feature_xyz", MPI_MAX_INFO_VAL-1,
value, &flag);
```
Possible points of contention:
- we have examples of using hints for clients to pass information to
implementations (striping_factor, cb_buffer_size) and examples of
implementations passing information to users (cb_nodes on Blue Gene), but we
don't have too many examples of two-way hints.
- will MPI_File_get_info return all info keys or just the ones the
implementation understands? The standard dictates what is required to be
returned. ROMIO (so de facto standard) will return the union of its internal
keys and any keys (known or unknown) passed in by the user.
- The use of "requested" as a hint value that the implementation can then
either set to "enabled" or "disabled" guards the situation where a user code
is passing these infos to an older MPI IO implementation. If the hint comes
back exactly as given, then the implementation ignored this feature request and
it is not supported. If the hint comes back "enabled" then the caller knows
something about the implementation.
Thanks
==rob
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
