Dear all,On behalf of the RMA WG I'd like to make the following voting and reading requests for the February meeting:
Second votes: *RMA: Add missing win-sync calls to Example 12.21* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/553 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/663PDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10042342/mpi41-report-rma-win-sync-20221118.pdf
*MPI_Win_free is synchronizing, except when it isn't* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/551 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/659PDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10042443/mpi41-report-mpi-win-free-sync-20221118.pdf
*RMA: Replace 'operation' with 'operator' where appropriate* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/429 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/637/filesPDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045184/mpi41-report-rma-operator-20221118.pdf
*Fix semantic terms in RMA chapter* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/407 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/611PDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045382/mpi41-report-rma-semantic-terms-20221118.pdf
*RMA: both MPI_WIN_ALLOCATE and MPI_WIN_ALLOCATE_SHARED allocate memory* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/554 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/664PDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/8652275/mpi40-report-rma-win-allocate-shared-20220509.pdf
For the following ticket, I'd like to request a no-no-reading and first vote:
*Allow MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY on created and allocated windows* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/23 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708/filesPDF: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045238/mpi41-report-win-shared-query.pdf Changes since last reading: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708/files/f63ac637abe36bd4eab51fcc04f57adda906beb6..d1d8f8037ab1d9979502e2f51022d65077dc6670
For the following tickets, I'd like to request a reading: *RMA communication procedures should have local semantics* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/653 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/769This change depends on the larger change adjusting the RMA chapter to the new semantics.
*Example 12.4: RMA communication calls may not block in PSCW* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/555 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/671This change depends on the larger change adjusting the RMA chapter to the new semantics.
*Wrap text about blocking MPI functions in Example 12.4 and 12.5 in AtoI* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/652 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/768 Thanks Joseph _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
