This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
Hello everyone,
Just a reminder for the CCs to review the changes in PR https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/954__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KEpS7O-R$ and add a checkmark for the chapter in the associated ticket https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/857__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KBT9U4jE$. All changes to the chapters are minor and it should take only two minutes to review them for each chapter. Thanks, Joseph -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Call for Review: Hyperlinks in the MPI document Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:00:04 -0500 From: Joseph Schuchart <schuch...@icl.utk.edu> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org> Hi all, As you probably know, I have been working on adding hyperlinks to the MPI standard document. The hyperref package complains about missing or doubly-defined targets so this process brought up quite a few inconsistencies across many chapters. I tried to fix most of them and some where addressed by the CCs already in separate PRs. There is no an issue for the PR with a task list for CCs to tick off after they checked their chapter in the PR: Issue: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/857__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KBT9U4jE$ PR: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/954__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KEpS7O-R$ Auto-generated PDF: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/actions/runs/11799495665__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KH7Sa5je$ All tests pass in the PR, after adjusting the LaTeX checks. There is a handful of missing symbols that are addressed in separate PRs so please only check the changes in #954. Clicking on links for which there are no targets defined leads to the first page of the PDF document. Unless they occur in your chapter, please ignore broken links for now, these should be addressed by the PRs below. If you have concerns with the changes in #954 please leave a comment on the PR. Other relevant PRs: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/969__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KEqGq58x$ https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/967__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KBKQ8KGj$ https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/966__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YvFGGbe_pjZZwPBgwHy3wypXrNr3PdHCEdb5V6RlNi3-U57_ZkaVDFog-udknucEtTcQy_5OEpxU6JqP313twNx3KEzqCjIc$ I hope this can make it into 4.2 so I would appreciate eyes on it in the next 10 days. I am not sure whether this should go through the full 2 votes or comes down to an editor change, since there are no semantic changes. Maybe Wes and Bill can advise on that. Many thanks Joseph
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum