I'm happy to switch to mercurial if everyone else agrees with it. Right now, I think the Bill has the definitive "repository" for eMPIRe, so I'll let him make that call.
--jason Jason Worth Martin Asst. Professor of Mathematics http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Cactus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Nov 6, 5:28 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository >>> problem!! I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours. I >>> also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should >>> be getting called. >> >> Hi Jason, >> >> That now seems likely since I synchronised after your update and my >> gmp_h.in doesn't have the new GCD declarations from Moller's version. >> >>> Anyway, get SVN back up and I'll be happy to dig in and see what's >>> going on. Without SVN, though, I'm reluctant to make any changes. >> >> I agree - without an effective SVN repository I can't do anything >> either. >> > > Not to revive an old problem, but remember when we had that big > discussion about using a distributed revision control system (like > mercurial or git) versus using a centralized system like SVN? Well > one of the main points of using a distributed system instead of a > centralized one, is so that one is never ever in a situation where: > "without an effective SVN repository I can't do anything". > > -- William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
