On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > OK, but I'm still unclear why it doesn't pick up the files in the > core2 directory. That is what it should do based on the code that is > there. This means noconas are giving a generic C build, which I am > sure Gonzalo would have complained about by now if it was the case, > because he has a nocona.
I do, but I never benchmarked it... only tested compilation and tests, sorry. When I did the patch for nocona the purpose was twofold (a) to make it work (same 64bit vs. 32bit issue) and (b) make sure -march=nocona and/or -mtune=nocona flags are passed to gcc... the latter, however, doesn't seem to be the case any more. Maybe someone can write down a step-by-step guide on how to run mpirbench to benchmark mpir? Even better if the code could be included in mpir and "make bench" would "just work(tm)". Gonzalo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
