Do you want to fix this for the release or just in trunk? If you are sure it can't be hit in the release, no need to fix it there.
2009/4/22 Jason Moxham <[email protected]>: > > > There is potential error in mul.c , the mul_2 is assumed to give the correct > result for size=1 . mul_n and addmul_n require size>=n in general . We are OK > because the current mul_2 for x86_64 and pentium (the only two cpus that have > one) happen to be correct for size=1 . > The refmpn.c also asserts size>=1 which in wrong , but try/speed all know > different . > > I'll fix it tonight. > > Jason > > > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:07:41 Jeff Gilchrist wrote: >> Penryn cygwin just passed all test with RC2 as well. >> >> Jeff. >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
