I think this article just highlights that there is some kind of competition between Mercurial and Git.
Mercurial is good for python projects, has better Windows support at present and is considerably faster in some benchmark. Git is more popular, is better for C and more sophisticated. I'm not panicked about making a choice. The fact that google has, may indeed be relevant as to who wins the competition though. Bill. 2009/4/27 Jeff Gilchrist <[email protected]>: > > Looks like Google Code has decided to adopt mercurial along side > subversion and opted not to use git. > > News article: > http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/04/google-code-adds-mercurial-version-control-system.ars > > Google's detailed analysis of Mercurial vs Git: > http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis > > With the recent talk about further VCS support I figured this might be useful. > > Jeff. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
