Ouch. Then I definitely am puzzled. MPIR 1.2 is oodles faster in almost every way. It's inconceivable unless something has slipped under the radar that the benchmark should be slower.
We may have to wait until Jason pops up again (he's switching his machine over to Windows) and ask him what he thinks. Bill. 2009/6/11 Jeff Gilchrist <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Bill Hart<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Oh wait, is this on Windows? If so, then drat! >> >> However Jason Moxham is soon going to be helping out with optimisation >> on Windows which should pick the speed up. When the code gets >> converted to the Windows calling conventions, sometimes it upsets the >> pipelining which has been done for the linux assembly code. Jason >> actually got funding to work on Windows for a period to address >> exactly this sort of thing. > > No, Linux 64bit. > > Jeff. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
