wrong dir

try cuda-stuff


On Saturday 31 October 2009 01:37:56 Antony Vennard wrote:
> Excellent, I've finally got internet again.
>
> I've grabbed svn from
> http://modular.math.jmu.edu/svn/mpir/mpir/branches/mpir-cuda/, when I
> run ./configure --build=CUDA on that svn pull, I get just linking to
> generic, I don't have the cuda file; indeed grep "cuda" * in the src
> folder turns up nothing, am I behind on svn commits?
>
> In theory, CUDA should execute C that is passed to it. There are
> separate functions for allocating memory and things, so, my add_n.cu
> simply has extern "C" prepended to mp_limb_t add.... I was going to try
> building that and see where the library failed to understand which bits
> of C require re-writing. In short, no I haven't got anything working on
> CUDA yet, that's why I was trying to learn the build system, to allow me
> to experiment...
>
> if you've got access to cuda1, have a look in
> /usr/local/cuda_sdk/projects/cppIntegration, this is how the SDK
> recommends integration of CUDA source / C app (/library).
>
> Anyway, thanks for your help on this!
>
> Antony
>
> Jason Moxham wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > ./configure --build=cuda-unknown-linux-gnu --disable-shared && make
> > now builds with
> >
> > config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/add_1.c to mpn/add_1.c
> > config.status: linking ./mpn/cuda/add_n.cu to mpn/add_n.cu
> > config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sub.c to mpn/sub.c
> >
> > although the file itself (add_n.cu) is some random cuda junk.
> > If we put a real usefull cuda file in the directory then it may work :)
> > Do we have a demo one ? even if its slow and only partially right.
> >
> > The shared build is a simple matter of not passing -fPIC , and the lib
> > paths could be wrong , and ten billion other things.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Wednesday 28 October 2009 02:21:15 Jason Moxham wrote:
> >> svn branches cuda-stuff
> >> build with
> >> ./configure --build=cuda-unknown-linux-gnu
> >> make
> >>
> >> put *.cu in mpn/cuda directory
> >>
> >> Doesn't actually build with *.cu files yet , probably missed something
> >> simple , anyway I must sleep
> >>
> >> Still need to add linker paths as well
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 18:32:36 Antony Vennard wrote:
> >>> Sorry i've been out of contact everyone, new job and house move this
> >>> week, no broadband until thursday night. On the up side it may be fast
> >>> broadband.
> >>>
> >>> Yes please if you could, at least so i can understand how it's done.
> >>> Have pulled a load of documentation on openmp too so if that requires
> >>> the same thing i'll be able to do it, if not well hopefully i'll work
> >>> out another solution.
> >>>
> >>> Finally, not urgent, i won't be able to update my repository until
> >>> thursday.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Antony
> >>>
> >>> On 10/27/09, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Yes, definitely do that. From another email I see Antony is waiting
> >>>> for that. And I think it is a good first step. Maybe we wont do that
> >>>> as a final solution. But who knows. It might work well for us. Let's
> >>>> try it and see. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2009/10/26 jason <[email protected]>:
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have been a bit busy of late , so do you still want me to do what I
> >>>>> suggested , tarbox doesn't have a working autotools , so I will have
> >>>>> to do it on my machine and upload it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have just found this
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.bealto.com/mp-gpu_mem.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which has gone some GPU stuff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2:25 am, Antony Vennard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Jason,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok, that's what I thought but I thought I'd ask. I'm happy to check
> >>>>>> out from subversion of that's easier, or just apply a patch I don't
> >>>>>> mind.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I like git because I can set up a branch that tracks Bill's Selmer
> >>>>>> repo, which is in turn tracking svn, and merge those updates into
> >>>>>> what I'm doing easily, plus if I type git diff brancha..branchb I
> >>>>>> get a patch just like that, so I can see the changes being made
> >>>>>> easily. This can probably be done with subversion, I've just never
> >>>>>> been exposed enough to it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've set up and built the cuda_sdk examples on cuda1 on tarbox.org,
> >>>>>> they're in /usr/local/cuda_sdk, in particular
> >>>>>> /usr/local/cuda_sdk/projects/cppIntegration shows you how c/c++ and
> >>>>>> cuda integrate and the appropriate makefiles how they build. In
> >>>>>> brief, it seems that nvcc processes all .cu files which are run on
> >>>>>> the gpu, gcc everything else and the two are linked as normal... as
> >>>>>> such, I think we merely need to produce .cu versions of any
> >>>>>> algorithm code which should then compile in. It may take more than
> >>>>>> that though, hence why I was trying to work out the build system to
> >>>>>> test it...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm currently working on my local copy of mpir (not on cuda1) but I
> >>>>>> could move it up there if that's easier?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Antony
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jason Moxham wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 21:40:33 Antony Vennard wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've been trying to get my head around how to attack CUDA and MPIR
> >>>>>>>> and bring the two together. So far I've come up with doing the
> >>>>>>>> following:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1) mpn implementation should be in mpn/cuda. This folder has,
> >>>>>>>> essentially, a copy of "generic" but with things like add_n.c
> >>>>>>>> implemented in add_n.cu (or it will have). This bit I think makes
> >>>>>>>> sense
> >>>>>>>> 2) This bit not so. I added --enable-cuda as an option to
> >>>>>>>> configure, which is fine and dandy, BUT, config.status links to
> >>>>>>>> the x86_64 code, which is correct. The question is, do we treat
> >>>>>>>> cuda as a cpu type? It effectively is... being where the
> >>>>>>>> processing will be done, if so, do we
> >>>>>>>> rely on the user setting ./configure --host=cuda or something?
> >>>>>>>> 3) I thought, from my original plan, of editing the Makefile in
> >>>>>>>> mpn to only include compiler options and rules for %.cu.o and nvcc
> >>>>>>>> and all the
> >>>>>>>> cuda-related stuff if --enable-cuda was set. However... this isn't
> >>>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>> I'm now thinking.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thoughts on this anyone? Sorry, still trying to get my head around
> >>>>>>>> the build system a little... but I think changing the host type,
> >>>>>>>> modifying config.status to link mpn/cuda to mpn as needed and
> >>>>>>>> change the appropriate makefiles is the way to go. Think, that
> >>>>>>>> is...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not sure if its the best long term solution , we will have to
> >>>>>>> see how it
> >>>>>>> all works out , but to get going I can think of no easier way. It
> >>>>>>> may be
> >>>>>>> easier for me to add in a new cpu type rather than try to explain
> >>>>>>> how to do
> >>>>>>> it. It will take me longer to figure out the new git system.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If I set up a new cpu "cuda" , I dont know how to autodetect it ,
> >>>>>>> but we can
> >>>>>>> force any build with ./configure --build=cuda-unknown-linux-gnu ,
> >>>>>>> ideally   --
> >>>>>>> enable-cuda could force this build (or autodetect) , this would set
> >>>>>>> mpn-paths
> >>>>>>> and compiler options (at least for gnu/gcc) . I am assuming we are
> >>>>>>> only x86_64
> >>>>>>> based , which even if we are not it will do to get started. Adding
> >>>>>>> rules for
> >>>>>>> cuda compiler should be straightforward once we have an example
> >>>>>>> cuda file and
> >>>>>>> how to compile it. Are you using "cuda1" on tarbox ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jason
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> NB if you just want to look at some of my changes, try
> >>>>>>>> http://vennard.org.uk/gitweb/?p=mpir.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/a
> >>>>>>>>v _c uda (yes, it's messy).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Antony
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Antony Vennard
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Web Address:http://vennard.org.uk/
> >>>>>> OpenPGP Key:http://vennard.org.uk/keys/arv_gmail.asc


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to