The new dc_divappr_q_n ran for 16 hours or something like that, without any problems. So it seems to be ok implementation-wise.
Bill. 2009/12/6 Bill Hart <[email protected]>: > I've committed a "new" version of dc_divappr_q_n. I've done the following: > > 1) Changed the algorithm slightly (not that different to what was > already there, but basically what I described to Brian and Jason about > a month ago). > > 2) Added some comments giving an indication of why the algorithm works. > > 3) Figured out how to trigger the case at the end of the algorithm > which we couldn't trigger with the test suite previously and checked > that it works in that case. > > 4) Added a note that the current incarnation is not the original > author's responsibility. > > 5) Begun extensive testing on Selmer using lt_try and the mpn test suite. > > We will need to run a complete new set of tests of MPIR on our test > machines now that this has all been done, but let's wait until the > next release candidate is done before starting that. We still have the > next_prime thing to sort out and a few other bits and pieces. > > Bill > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
