Go back and read what I wrote.

2010/1/11 Gianrico Fini <[email protected]>:
> Hei! And what about the same mess on mersenne?
>
> Gian.
>
> On 11 Gen, 04:03, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> I don't know if you've been following the discussion with Gianrico....
>>
>> ....but would it be possible to change the benchmark code so that when
>> running the benchmark linked against GMP it prints something like:
>>
>> "Warning: using (slow) *simulated* mpn_mulmod_2expp1" in the Fermat test."
>>
>> Actually I thought they had such a function now. But I think I am
>> wrong about this.
>>
>> Similarly, for GMP < 5.0.0 can we print a similar warning for the
>> mpn_mulmod_2expm1 function used in the Mersenne test.
>>
>> And for >= GMP 5.0.0 can we use their new mpn_mulmod_bnm1 function,
>> which is presumably the equivalent of Jason's mpn_mulmod_2expm1
>> function.
>>
>> It would be good to issue this along with the MPIR 1.3.0 release when
>> we finally get it out. I've sorted out the remaining tickets, but I'm
>> having autoconf troubles again....
>>
>> Bill.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "mpir-devel" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to