On Jan 11, 7:48 am, Gianrico Fini <[email protected]> wrote: > I missed this yesterday... (I was sleepy) > > On 11 Gen, 03:50, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We finally agree! That function is a joke! > > > I'm talking about the real mpn_mulmod_2expp1 function in mpn/generic, > > not the stupid alternative in the benchmark. > > You say the real function is a joke, and the alternative is stupid... > Let me conclude, the benchmark is a fake, please remove it. > > It will be a gain for you too! > Since you admit: it is not even a good example to show the full > functionality of the new function!
I am afraid that you are misusing my benchmark, which I provede as a way of monitoring aspects of MPIR development. If you look at the readme.txt provided with the bechmark you will immediately see my intention: This benchmark is intended to test the performance of MPIR by measuring the speed of basic arithmetic operations and the speed of a number of applications. It is NOT intended for use in comparing MPIR and GMP and, as you have quickly discovered, it is completely inappropriate for this. Brian Gladman
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
