Perfect!

On 16 April 2010 22:19, Antony Vennard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/16/2010 09:36 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>> On 16 April 2010 21:32, Antony Vennard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/16/2010 09:15 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>>>> On 16 April 2010 20:54, Antony Vennard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Alrighty, sounds good to me, just checking 'cause you've mentioned
>>>>> "off-list" support a lot...
>>>>
>>>> Yes, lots of "off-list" support, which I encourage people to put
>>>> "on-list" where possible please!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Excellent :D
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, Django is my current favourite web framework. I looked at a lot of
>>>>> PHP frameworks but I couldn't get excited about them and most enforce
>>>>> MVC and strict url parsing: http://bsdnt.org/class/function/argument ->
>>>>> class{ function (args} } which isn't massively flexible. Django is happy
>>>>> either way.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'd need a server with Python installed, preferably 2.6+. mod_wsgi is
>>>>> also the easiest way of integrating with apache which is what I've been
>>>>> doing - none of this fancy nginx/lighttpd stuff. Database can be
>>>>> anything supported - SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL. I've heard good stuff
>>>>> about the latter.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Selmer has mod_wsgi, python 2.6.2, python_django, postgresql
>>>> installed. I've just sent you a username and password to log in.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I'll have a look and start building something up.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So that'd basically be the idea - to build a "lite" CMS using Django so
>>>>> anyone, not just web devs, can add say "news updates" or "version
>>>>> releases" and modify repository urls, contributor details etc WITHOUT
>>>>> digging through HTML. It won't be a fully fledged CMS - new content
>>>>> types will need someone to hack on Django.
>>>>>
>>>>> The beauty of this is we can build tools to suit. Trac looks pretty good
>>>>> and is also python but you could easily re-implement it.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm. Trac is pretty sophisticated. I'd be surprised if you could just
>>>> reimplement it.
>>>>
>>>> Also bear in mind I know nothing whatsoever about CMS's. I once used
>>>> Drupal and found it impossible to figure out. Website stuff is not my
>>>> thing at all.
>>>
>>> Probably not in one hit, but over time. The alternative would be to
>>> merge it somehow with Django. I've never looked at it from a source
>>> perspective, but I imagine there's all sorts of interesting combinations
>>> of trac+django. Their both being python means we can pull trac info into
>>> Django, too. I expect at least a level of compatibility and interoperation.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Name a tool and
>>>>> we can probably create it quickly enough. Upload a zip file? Submit a
>>>>> patch? Send a question to the mailing list? Add a sponsor? Add a test
>>>>> result? Publish a new test matrix? All done relatively easily.
>>>>>
>>>>> The rest would be "branding" via CSS and static media such as images,
>>>>> tarballs and whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I like django. I can however do PHP too if anybody really wants
>>>>> that. I've never used Ruby but I've heard good things about Rails and
>>>>> Sinatra.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Let's keep it pretty simple for now. I personally "get" Ruby. But it
>>>> has not gained as much of a following as say Python. So I've not put
>>>> much time into learning it. Moreover, I know very little about rails.
>>>> I've never personally used PHP, but it is a great language from what I
>>>> know of it. I've never heard of Sinatra.
>>>
>>> Django is a framework on which you build web apps - you basically have a
>>> copy of its libraries in /usr/lib/python-xx/site-packages on the
>>> PYTHON_PATH and you create a few files that Django would like to be
>>> there (or else you tell it something different) and it all magically
>>> works. The PHP frameworks are conceptually similar in that you have a
>>> library of PHP classes which are "included" into your current site,
>>> although it doesn't work quite as cleanly as django, which is on the
>>> python path.
>>>
>>> Python path is comparable to path for executables, LD_LIBRARY_PATH or
>>> the Java Classpath. It's good.
>>>
>>> See djangoproject.com and there's a free "Django book" out there too,
>>> both of which are really good resources.
>>>
>>> CMSes themselves I have never been entirely happy with - there's always
>>> something not-quite-to-my-liking and customisation is always just out of
>>> reach. With Django, we don't need a full CMS product (like drupal), we
>>> can build just the dynamic content we like the idea of and code the rest
>>> in as html/css. The other thing I forgot to mention is templating - you
>>> only create one or two base templates and the rest inherit from that,
>>> minimising the amount of html you have to write which is a massive bonus
>>> as far as I'm concerned.
>>>
>>> I'm no web guru but I know enough to get by - to be honest though, most
>>> web dev is just a little bit dull. The real fun stuff is written in C...
>>
>> That's right, which is why I would say keep it simple for now. Better
>> to have your coding effort spent on writing great C code for us,
>> rather than reinventing trac. :-)
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing what emerges on the website front. What we
>> have for MPIR is currently a pain to maintain and I've never had the
>> time to learn anything other than html and css (the latter of which I
>> didn't use for the MPIR website).
>>
>> Bill.
>>
>
>
> Right, I'll build something basic for now - probably minimally themed
> until we've agreed on stuff like branding and a name... maybe it'll
> actually stay that way, who knows. I'll write something simple and
> upload it to my staging server over the weekend/early next week so
> people can look, comment and complain then we have something simple to
> put live soon-ish.
>
> Primary goal is easy maintenance of whatever content is on the pages so
> that "releasing" etc doesn't take as much html editing as it does C code.
>
> Antony
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "mpir-devel" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to