On 1 June 2010 14:20, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 01 June 2010 00:16:06 Bill Hart wrote: >> So here's a summary of the remaining bugs that we can actually fix >> (i.e. ones that aren't due to incorrectly set up machines or bugs in >> gcc and excluding duplicates): >> >> * gcc55 - undefined reference to _gmpn_invert_limb >> >> * cicero - t-dc_bdiv_q >> inv_divappr_q.c:45: GNU MP assertion failed: dn >= 6 >> >> * t-dc_bdiv_q >> /bin/sh: line 4: 10641 Segmentation fault (probably a tuning issue >> - tuning code broken) >> >> * rosemary >> redefinition of ‘__gmpn_divrem_hensel_qr_1 (will need access to be >> able to fix this)
So if we can get access to rosemary, (Minh?) we can see what is the cause of this, and I think it will be time for another RC. >> >> * bsd.math >> Invalid configuration `longlong-apple-darwin10.3.0 >> > fixed the test script > >> * gcc 101 >> ylwrap: No such file or directory (probably automake --addmissing >> will fix this, but we'd need to put ylwrap under version control?) >> > ylwrap is in rc1, we can still add it to the svn though , otherwise we will > need to --add-missing every time we make dist , however for the bsd error I > dont know what is going on here , there appear to be similar errors reported > on the web but it doesn't look like any help , I assume ylwrap got unpacked > properly and the system didn't run out of disk quota or some such? OK, so this one looks like a BSD related bug to do with autotools. I would recommend creating a ticket, adding it to the list of "Known Problems" on the website and move on. I don't think it is worth spending the time screwing around with this at this point. No sense in holding up the majority of users for a handful. Having said that, it might be interesting to see if GMP suffers from the same problem on this machine, and if not, try to determine why. > >> * t2 >> Invalid configuration `longlong-sun-solaris2.10 >> > fixed the test script > >> Bill. >> >> On 31 May 2010 23:58, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yep, the same bug appears in dc_divappr_q.c, so I've fixed that too. >> > All tests pass on my machine and on sextus. >> > >> > Bill. >> > >> > On 31 May 2010 23:52, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've fixed the bug on sextus. This turned out to be a whole missing >> >> case in inv_divappr_q.c. I'll have to figure out which other files are >> >> affected by the same bug. I likely copied this from somewhere. >> >> >> >> I've committed a fix to svn anyhow. >> >> >> >> Bill. >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2010 17:11, Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jason, >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:18 AM, jason <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> <SNIP> >> >>> >> >>>> Some suggested changes >> >>> >> >>> The news section [1] and changelog [2] have been updated. Thank you. >> >>> >> >>> [1] http://www.mpir.org >> >>> >> >>> [2] http://www.mpir.org/changes.html >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Regards >> >>> Minh Van Nguyen >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>> Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to >> >>> [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email >> >>> to [email protected]. For more options, visit >> >>> this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
