On 2 June 2010 19:10, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 June 2010 18:23:31 Bill Hart wrote:
>> Two comments:
>>
>> * Fat builds don't need to work on many systems. We only support x86
>> and x86_64 and basically people only need to be able to find one linux
>> machine with a working gcc to make one.
>>
>
> True , but isn't the object format different for the bsd/mac ? , perhaps not?

Not sure. It's not an argument to not support them. I just think it
isn't so important at the moment if we do.

>
>> Q. Is that the difference between check and test, i.e. one is a fat
>> build and the other is a source build?
>>
>
> One is a simple ./configure make make check make tune and the other is 4 to 16
> combinations of options ie C,fat,gcc,cc,icc,c++

Ah ok.

>
>> * I've never tried dropping the optimisation on gcc 4.3.2 to see if
>> the problem goes away.
>
> do we have gcc-4.3.2 on skynet ?

Not that I know of.

I guess you don't have access to FSFFrance.

>
>> We could do that for that one version of gcc
>> perhaps?
>>
>
> not sure how to drop the O level for one specific version of gcc without a
> small test case

Yeah I have no idea.

>
>> Bill.
>>
>> On 2 June 2010 17:45, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Looks good , there are only 2 or 3 real errors
>> >
>> > your cleo and iras errors are because you need to get icc in your path  ,
>> > you will hit 1 real error then , but we can easily fix that.
>> >
>> > for lena and flavius gcc34 doesn't have a g++
>> >
>> > gcc54 has a broken c++
>> >
>> > gcc42 has a broken c++ and there is no way to get  a timer for tuning
>> > (same for cato)
>> >
>> > fulvia gcc4.5.0 is not installed right
>> >
>> > fulvia cc , 1 real error , suns assembler is old , we should force it to
>> > use yasm is all cases , I see if I can do it (I have to remove my brain
>> > first , to get in the autotools mood) , but it may have to wait for next
>> > release.
>> >
>> > bsd.math  we dont support fat builds on a mac (PIC code is different) and
>> > they arn't needed that much
>> >
>> > gcc101 is a bsd system and I think we dont support fat builds (same as
>> > above?) so possibly a real error
>> >
>> > rest of the machines use gcc-4.3.2 which is broken
>> >
>> > I have updated the test script to reflect some of changes , but there are
>> > a lot of broken systems , so we will still get some errors from these.
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > On Wednesday 02 June 2010 16:47:22 Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> Build and test results for MPIR 2.1.0-rc2 on the build farm are
>> >> available at
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/mpir/BuildFarm/mpir-2.1.0#MPIR2.1.0-rc2
>> >>
>> >> Each build was done using one thread, i.e. first exporting
>> >>
>> >> $ export MAKE='make'
>> >>
>> >> The test suite was ran using one CPU. On some machines, doing a
>> >> parallel build would result in a failure to tune, i.e. doing
>> >>
>> >> $ make tune
>> >>
>> >> after a parallel build would fail. So for each reported machine, I
>> >> only used one thread/CPU for build, check, tune, and test suite.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards
>> >> Minh Van Nguyen
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
>> > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
>> > to [email protected]. For more options, visit this
>> > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "mpir-devel" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to