Does this use Linux calling conventions or C calling conventions? The problem is, on Windows 64 the assembly code usually needs to be specially written to support the correct calling conventions.
This has been done for the MSVC build, but I don't know how MinGW-64 handles this, and we certainly didn't do anything to configure to fix this yet. So at present, you get much, much better performance from the MSVC build, I think. I also personally had problems getting MinGW-64 to work at all on my Windows 7 machine. These issues may have been fixed in the past few months though, as it has been a while since I tried. Bill. On 17 July 2010 14:23, degski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > >> If you want 64bit (which will be MUCH faster) then use MSVC if you can , >> we do support the free download version > > > I'm not claiming MPIR compiles correctly (haven't tried compiling > MPIR, but was able to compile various other libs correctly), but > MinGW-w64 - for 64 bit Windows now exists. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/ > > Cheers > > > degski > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
