Hey Bill. I'm wondering if the documentation will be corrected?
Regards
Chris Saunders
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hart
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 7:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Another disagreement between documentation and
mpir.h
I think the unsigned long int is correct this time. I see no reason
why the remove function should return a number of bits.
Bill.
On 2 May 2011 23:42, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
Here is the documented API:
mp_bitcnt_t mpz_remove (mpz t rop, mpz t op, mpz t f)
from mpir.h:
#define mpz_remove __gmpz_remove
__GMP_DECLSPEC unsigned long int mpz_remove __GMP_PROTO ((mpz_ptr,
mpz_srcptr, mpz_srcptr));
Notice mp_bitcnt_t from the docs and unsigned long int from the header.
I'm
working on an interface to Eiffel and need to know wether to use a 32 or
64
bit type?
Regards
Chris Saunders
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
