On Friday 20 January 2012 02:43:11 jason wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 1:07 am, Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:42:35 Jason wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:32:02 Cactus wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the testing. You are right - the t-locale.c test failure is
> > > > not
> > > > a major concern.
> >
> > > > Has anyone tested a Linux build for the mpir-exp branch?
> >
> > > This will need some configure work done first , I was just waiting for it
> > > to settle done a bit , I should have the time tonight
> >
> > > > Brian
> >
> > done it except for the new fft tuning . I had to change a minor bit about
> > ULLONG_MAX in tests/t-constants.c as I dont think unix has these or if
> > configure supports them , I'll check
>
> Tried running the stand alone fft-tune with FLINT_BITS=64 and even
> with 3GB and swap space I cant tune the second param
>
> /* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */
>
> #ifndef FFT_TUNING_H
> #define FFT_TUNING_H
>
> #include "mpir.h"
>
> #define FFT_TAB \
> { { 4, 3 }, { 4, 3 }, { 3, 2 }, { 2, 1 }, { 2, 1 } }
>
> #define MULMOD_TAB \
> { Segmentation fault
>
> It clearly uses too much memory
>
> Jason
>
>
compiling mpir with --enable-assert we get this straight away
/* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */
#ifndef FFT_TUNING_H
#define FFT_TUNING_H
#include "mpir.h"
#define FFT_TAB \
{ { mulmod_2expp1_basecase.c:51: GNU MP assertion failed: !((xp) + (n) >
(yp) && (yp) + (n) > (xp))
Aborted
which is a partial overlap of src and dst in the function
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
