Carol writes:
>Regarding the Metrodome events and the use of LRT. The question of why
this
>is an issue is a good one. 80% of transit riders are riding to get to
work.
>75% of transit riders ride during the peak periods of 7:00 - 9:00 am and
>3:30 to 6:30 pm. Transit is basically for two purposes: 1) to get people
to
>work during peak periods and 2) to provide a basic level of transit for
>people who have no other alternative. Neither of these functions has much
to
>do with providing transportation for special events like the Vikings. As
>such, I would argue that this isn't really a fair criterion to judge the
>effectiveness of LRT.
I think it's a fair criterion, just not the major one. (The thread started
when someone questioned the possible stack-up of PRT cars at big events.)
Admittedly, though, the Metrodome is a sideshow compared to regular
commuting - yet major enough to include a stop where few workers work.
Anyway, I do think there's a generalizable point from the sports stuff: if
LRT can't handle lots of folks at peak before and after a game, how many can
it really handle at peak before and after work? I believe we need transit
alternatives, but I've long wondered whether the cost really justifies the
benefits.
David Brauer
King Field - Ward 10
