An idle thought rattling around my brain since we started discussing the
2001 Council races:
It's clear we will have a lot of first-time candidates. That's great,
because people with different life experiences can now apply that to
political office.
But there is also a lot to learn about governing the city -- even for the
involved and aware. Part of the skill you must display as a candidate is
becoming educated. Still, it must a nightmare, learning the details behind
city finances, the MCDA, the charter, etc. It must also be haphazard.
I wonder if we can make it easier for newcomers. So here's my question --
especially to those who have run or those who are going to:
Would it be worth it to try to set up "candidates continuing education"
class? My idea -- very loose at this point -- is something like the Kennedy
School of Government does for new Congressfolks. Get together a group of
experienced community folks -- city bureaucrats, representatives of
important foundations or community groups, people experienced in
government -- and provide a series of voluntary tutorials on city basics.
(The Kennedy school does this for the winners, but I want to do it before,
not after the election.)
No candidate would have to attend, but those who do might have a better
underpinning about why what goes on and why. Theoretically, candidates'
policies might become smarter, or more sophisticated -- or if they are in
opposition, their arguments could become sharper.
The key thing is that we, the voters, would benefit if positions are more
thoughtfully worked out and better argued.
There are, of course some dangers. Candidates might feel they are being
"indoctrinated" by the very people they seek to reform. We would have to
work out a way to make it clear this is non-partisan, and candidates --
whether they agree or disagree -- should not treat this as a debate but a
learning experience they can accept or reject. Obviously, there would have
to be some thought as to a broad-based program of speakers, not just
elitists, or insiders, etc.
Also, city staffers might be worried incumbants would penalize them if they
are educating challengers or outsiders. And opponents for the same seat
might not want to share a room, and tip off their arguments.
Anyway, I know good candidates spend a lot of time educating themselves. But
I think seminar approach might be an important compliment.
The question is, is it a good idea, or a pie-in-the-sky waste of time?
Please post your reaction to the forum: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Brauer
Kingfield - Ward 10
Not a candidate for anything but always has more to learn
