This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------5135ECAF47BE0888E15E4F13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm really sorry that the attachment keeps getting messed up.  The text
version is not as pretty but works on my computer so here it is:



--------------5135ECAF47BE0888E15E4F13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
 name="CITY CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="CITY CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE.txt"

  
  
  MINNEAPOLIS 2001 CITY CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE: 
  
  BRIAN HANNINEN
  Candidate for City Council, Ward 2
  Neighborhoods of Cedar-Riverside, Como, Downtown East, Elliot Park, Marcy-
  Holmes, Prospect Park East River Road, Seward, and University
  
  Comments:
  
  I envision Minneapolis becoming a city that provides opportunities for all of its
  residents to achieve fulfilling lives.  The individual defines fulfillment whether 
it is
  defined by career, religion, family, art, physical exercise, music, philosophy, or
  other fields of human endeavor.  Government can assist individuals by investing
  in public infrastructure, parks, commercial districts, housing, education,
  consumer protection regulations, the courts, and all other facets of civic life.  The
  City of Minneapolis must continue to maintain and invest in the civic life of the
  City.  Residents must be engaged in the decisions that occur within their
  neighborhoods and communities.  Greater participation by individuals in civic life
  will create the Community that all of us seek.
  
  Under what circumstances would you support any public funding for sports  
  facilities intended primarily for the use of private professional teams? 
   
  I will support the public financing of sports facilities if both 1) the sports 
facility
  will advance the creation of community among the residents of the City and the
  region; and 2) the City of Minneapolis receives a reasonable return on its
  investment.  For condition #1 to occur, the sports facility will have to work with
  the residents of the surrounding neighborhood to identify how the facility could:
  support the commercial success of community business; reduce concerns of
  safety around the facility; provide meeting space for community events; and
  support the philanthropic organizations within the neighborhood and Twin Cities
  region.  For condition #2 to occur, the professional sports team and the City
  would have to reach agreement on the City's share of: concessions' sales,
  revenue generated from luxury boxes, proceeds from advertising within and
  outside the sports facility, as well as any other revenue-generating activities.  The
  project would also have to return to the property tax rolls as soon as financially
  possible.
   
  Under what circumstances would you support subsidies or special tax 
  breaks for for-profit corporations engaged in commercial development? 
   
  Business subsidies can be provided to strengthen the long-term economic
  success of the residents and businesses within the City of Minneapolis.  Among
  the goals to be supported by business subsidies include: 1) new employment
  opportunities; 2) livable wages; 3) support of local entrepreneurs; 4) brownfield
  cleanup and redevelopment; and 5) repairs to the City's physical infrastructure. 
  Ideally business subsidies would go to local businesses that will create linkages
  with several other local businesses.  Development on brownfields is desired
  because of the infrastructure already present at these sites and the need to
  reduce the commercial development on farmland and natural areas in the
  metropolitan region.    The fiscal constraints faced by the City of Minneapolis and
  the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) will require careful
  selection of business subsidies and their recipients.
  
  What is your position on domestic partner benefits for city employees? 
   
  Domestic partnerships, regardless of sexual orientation, should receive
  medical and retirement benefits from the City.  All workers must be able to help
  support their families.  Guidance from the State of Minnesota for a legal definition
  of a domestic union would be helpful.  However, the City should proceed to apply
  benefits equally among its employees even if the State does not provide
  guidance in this matter.
  
  What, if any additional civilian oversight for the Minneapolis police 
  department do you support? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  Do you have any proposals to address racial profiling and other racial 
  disparities in police encounters with citizens? 
   
  The elevation of racial profiling to public awareness has revealed the
  underlying racial biases within the City of Minneapolis.  The City and the region
  have never acknowledged the discrimination that its residents, businesses, and
  governments have practiced.  I say "have practiced" because the stereotypes
  with which we use to hire employees, to direct renters and homebuyers to
  particular neighborhoods, and to inform clients of available services, are still
  used.  While discrimination is not as overt as it once was in Minneapolis, it still
  exists.  Racial profiling is, I think, more a reflection of the behavior of the 
people
  in the region rather than a reflection of Police Department policy.   This is not to
  say that I excuse the police for its treatment of citizens.  On the contrary I
  condemn both the actions of the Minneapolis Police Department and the actions
  of the residents, businesses, and governments in the City and the surrounding
  region.
  
  I propose that the racial tensions among all parties in the City be dealt with
  openly.  A Citywide discussion of our racial past, present, and future should be
  done.  The City of Minneapolis should act as coordinator of such a community
  discussion.  The media outlets must be engaged to publicize the issue.  Citizens
  must be actively recruited to discuss and then act upon the proposals from such
  discussions.  The City of New Orleans had gone through just such an effort and
  can be used as a model for us to consider.
  
  As for the Minneapolis Police Department, all efforts should be made to
  continually reinforce through training and management's actions that race can
  not be used as a tool for providing public safety.  I believe that the City of
  Minneapolis should have a police department that continuously seeks to improve
  its performance.  I support investing in training, professional development, and
  technology that can give the City a police department that serves its residents
  effectively and equally.
  
  What support or criticism do you express for current police department 
  practices such as the following: 
  - CODEFOR 
  - SAFE program 
  - Responses to political protests 
  
  Will comment at a later time.
   
  Do you believe that police department leaders should have a role in 
  setting policy for the city government?  If so, what do you believe 
  should be the scope and extent of that role? 
   
  Police department leaders should have a role in setting internal policy for the
  Police Department.  The City Council and the Mayor have responsibility for
  establishing policies for the police department with regards to emphasis on public
  safety initiatives, i.e. SAFE, community policing, CODEFOR, et cetera.  Police
  department officials have the responsibility for providing the city leaders with
  information necessary to base decisions upon.  This is true for all city agencies --
  agency managers and staff provide information to the City Council and Mayor on
  which sound and reasoned decisions can be based.  All City agencies, including
  the Police Department, are responsible for determining internal policies and
  procedures that support the City Council's and Mayor's policies.
  
  Do you support the city's policy of holding landlords and their property 
  accountable for the criminal actions of tenants, non-tenants and 
  passerby?  What changes or enhancements to this policy, if any, would 
  you support? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  How do you feel about the city's physical appearance? 
   
  The City of Minneapolis is a striking city.  Its downtown and neighborhoods 
  are comparatively clean.  The abandoned commercial and industrial buildings
  can be magnets for arson and catalysts for neighborhood blight.  These
  properties must either be demolished or, preferably, be securely boarded up until
  the properties can be sold for redevelopment.  The aging sewer and water
  system, which we can not see, should also be of concern to the City.
  
  Do you believe that there is any problem with the amount of trash and 
  graffiti on the streets?  What solutions would you propose? 
   
  Both trash and graffiti contribute to the perception of decline of a city. 
  Communities within Minneapolis will benefit as the occurrences of graffiti and
  trash in our parks and on our streets decrease.  I support waiting to allow the
  City's current anti-graffiti program to have sufficient time to accurately evaluate
  the results of the program.  After an evaluation of the program is conducted, the
  City Council and the Mayor can judge how to proceed.
  
  I am a little wary of the City's attempt to have businesses sponsor trash
  containers in front of their businesses.  I hope that succeeds in keeping those
  areas free of trash on the streets.  If not, the City Council and the Mayor will have
  to find money to provide this as a public service.
  
  What initiatives would you propose to increase the supply of affordable 
  housing? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  Do you support strengthening the living wage ordinance?  If so, 
  describe. 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  What solutions or initiatives would you propose to improve the quality 
  of life in the most impoverished areas of the City? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  Do you believe that the City should be committed to social 
  responsibility in determining its investments and  business 
  transactions?  For example, would you support the following: 
  - Refusal to contract with or invest with companies that use sweatshop 
  labor 
  - Refusal to contract with or invest in companies that are actively 
  involved with oppressive governments 
   
  The City should be socially responsible when using its financial resources. 
  The City should not encourage the use of labor practices that destroy the human
  spirit such as sweatshops and child labor.  I would support that the City refuse to
  contract or invest with companies that use sweatshop labor.  
  
  The second suggested policy is more problematic.  The problem arises in
  defining oppressive governments.  Is it a government without democratically
  elected leaders, i.e., Vatican City?  How does one define democratic -- is it
  election by popular vote (Iran) or election by representatives of the people (the
  U.S. Electoral College)?  Is it oppressive when police confessions are the typical
  means in determining guilt (Japan)?  Is an oppressive government defined as
  one with a large segment of a nation's population imprisoned (the U.S.)?  Is an
  oppressive government one that spends more money for its military than
  reasonably needed for national defense (France)?  I would support a policy that
  forbids City agencies to have any business dealings with companies that are
  actively involved with oppressive governments only if there is a universally
  accepted definition of oppressive government.  By "universally accepted" I mean
  that this definition is not exclusively defined through Western belief systems.
  
  What proposals would you advance to reduce the high levels of air 
  pollution in the city? 
  
  Will comment at a later time.
   
  What level of priority and what initiatives would you support for 
  maintaining the quality and integrity of the lakes, creeks, and rivers 
  in the City? 
  
  Will comment at a later time.
   
  Would you support any initiatives to encourage the use of organic 
  foods? If so, please describe. 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  Do you support the current noise plan for the airport?      Do you support 
  moving the airport to another location?  How would you go about 
  addressing the noise issues? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  What is your analysis of the current process for distributing NRP funds? 
   
  Will comment at a later time.
  
  What are your feelings and assessment of the diversity of people that 
  you would be representing, in terms of ethnicity, income, values, life 
  styles, age, and physical appearance?  How will you be able to respect 
  and serve their needs?     How will you balance the needs of different 
  groups whose concerns or interests my at times be in conflict? 
  
  Will comment at a later time.

--------------5135ECAF47BE0888E15E4F13--

Reply via email to