> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--MS_Mac_OE_3058272896_1663297_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
This should be the purview of the POST Board (Peace Officers Standards and
Training Board), the certification body for Minnesota police and other peace
officers. Of course, it's populated primarily by police officers, including
Minneapolis Police Officer Richard Stanek - a stet rep from Maple Grove who
also sits as chair of the House judiciary committee (or the criminal justice
division).
The wolf in the hen house - again.
Andy Driscoll
--
"Whatever keeps you from your work is your work."
Albert Camus
The Driscoll Group/Communications
Writing/Graphics/Strategic Development
835 Linwood Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55105
651-293-9039
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Dave Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 11:51:10 -0600
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Proposal to discuss police conduct
Please forgive me if I have missed previous comments on this aspect of the
issue. I was just wondering if there is, or has ever been, talk of setting
up a 'state-wide' police misconduct review board. Such a board would
(hopefully) objectively deal with the most egregious charges of police
misconduct in the entire state of Minnesota, above the fray of local
politics.
Due to current technology, board members from all corners of the state could
meet electronically on a regular basis, and all could receive
instantaneously and simultaneously the documents pertaining to each case.
Just a thought.
Dave Stack
Harrison
--MS_Mac_OE_3058272896_1663297_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Proposal to discuss police conduct</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
This should be the purview of the POST Board (Peace Officers Standards and =
Training Board), the certification body for Minnesota police and other peace=
officers. Of course, it's populated primarily by police officers, including=
Minneapolis Police Officer Richard Stanek - a stet rep from Maple Grove who=
also sits as chair of the House judiciary committee (or the criminal justic=
e division).<BR>
<BR>
The wolf in the hen house - again.<BR>
<BR>
Andy Driscoll<BR>
-- <BR>
"Whatever keeps you from your work <I>is </I> your work." <BR>
&n=
bsp; =
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; Albert=
Camus<BR>
The Driscoll Group/Communications<BR>
Writing/Graphics/Strategic Development<BR>
835 Linwood Ave.<BR>
St. Paul, MN 55105<BR>
651-293-9039<BR>
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<B>From: </B>"Dave Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><BR>
<B>Reply-To: </B>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<BR>
<B>Date: </B>Fri, 24 Nov 2000 11:51:10 -0600<BR>
<B>To: </B>"Multiple recipients of list" <mpls-issues@freedom2=
.mtn.org><BR>
<B>Subject: </B>Re: Proposal to discuss police conduct<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>Please forgive me if I have missed previous comments on this as=
pect of the<BR>
issue. I was just wondering if there is, or has ever been, talk of setting<=
BR>
up a 'state-wide' police misconduct review board. Such a board would<BR>
(hopefully) objectively deal with the most egregious charges of police<BR>
misconduct in the entire state of Minnesota, above the fray of local<BR>
politics.<BR>
<BR>
Due to current technology, board members from all corners of the state coul=
d<BR>
meet electronically on a regular basis, and all could receive<BR>
instantaneously and simultaneously the documents pertaining to each case.<B=
R>
Just a thought.<BR>
<BR>
Dave Stack<BR>
Harrison<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--MS_Mac_OE_3058272896_1663297_MIME_Part--
