The ALJ process was a legal process agreed on by the city council. Luther,
if you don't respect the LAW (a very peculiar attitude for someone in your
line of work), you might at least respect the concept of fairness.
And explain to me please, Mr. Downtown Command SAFE officer, why the Third
Precinct SAFE officers met twice with the owners of CUP Foods to try to
work out problems before sending in the heavy artillery, but the Downtown
Command never even made a gesture toward meeting with the Hard Times.
Rosalind Nelson
Bancroft
At 08:58 PM 1/19/01 -0800, Luther Krueger wrote:
>>
>I recall they voted against the closing down but didn't one or two of them
propose a lesser time period for the license to be suspended? That's not
the same as "opposing the closing down" of the cafe. I urge people to
contact city councilmembers too--you might ask them: How can the city take
any adverse action against a business when *public information* regarding
that same business (911 calls) is to be disregarded by our publicly elected
officials?
>
>If the city's action is overturned because some councilmembers actually
considered some context that was left out of, or suppressed by?, the ALJ
(Administrtive Law Judge) process, then I say: Good luck trying to close
down any licensed business in the city henceforth.
>
>
>Luther Krueger
>Lyndale N'hood 825-6281 Ward 8 Pct. 13 State dist 61B
>MPD Downtown Command SAFE 673-2923
>For PD biz e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Signup for your free USWEST.mail Email account http://www.uswestmail.net
>_______________________________________________
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
>
_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
