|
It was not my intention by posting my
impressions of the Progressive Minnesota endorsement process to provoke a
barrage of criticism of Progressive Minnesota. I actually thought the
endorsement meetings was a very constructive and postive event overall. A
good group of dedicated people learned a lot about the candidates and had
substantive discussions. I will elaborate on a few points from my
previous posting:
- While I believe that my interpretation of the 9th
ward endorsement being based on organizational connections was fundamentally
accurate (except Michael Guest apparently did resign from the Board before
seeking the endorsement), I do not necessarily see that as negative.
There is a lot of benefit to an organization that organizes around elections and
issues, and has actually been a minor political party, developing its
own candiates for office. At the same time, (particularly as a Gary Schiff
supporter), I think it is important for people to realize that PM's decision not
to endorse him had nothing to do with his obvious progressive stands on
issues.
- As for my previous analysis of the 10th Ward
race, I again think it was accurate but one of the points has
been overplayed. I think the lack of endorsement was based primarily on a
lack of familiarity with the candidates who had all announced recently.
The reality is that many PM members who participate in the endorsement process
are actively involved and are accustomed to knowing the candidates. I
also believe that the firm opposition to privatization of city services is
highly justified. It is obviously one of the schemes that governments and
their officials around the country have been using to sell out out to
corporate interests. The overwhelming effect is lower wages and union
busting. While my interpretation of Doug Kress' stand on
privatization differed from others', I do understand the
concerns.
- I have been a member of PM for a couple of years
because I support the work they have done in opposing stadium funding,
promoting affordable housing and living wage legislation, and previously
sponsoring a Charter amendment to close a loophole and bring the Minneapolis
police under the jurisdiction of the civil rights department, and building
coalitions among progressive activists and the labor movement. I do
not have PM's 12 point platform in front of me, but I have read and agreed
with it, and hope that someone can post it on this list. I like some
of the candidates that PM has supported, and frankly think that others are too
compromised. The point is that PM does have a specific agenda that
is worthy of support. Its electoral activism can also be constructive and
hopefully the feeback from this list can lead to more positive
developments.
Jordan Kushner
Powderhorn, Ward 8
|
- RE: [Mpls] PM Endorsement Process Jordan S. Kushner
- RE: [Mpls] PM Endorsement Process David Brauer
